Sebastian Prechtel vs Tomas Machac Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W L L L
Form
W W W W L W W W L LH2H: Prechtel 1 - 0 Machac
They have played 2 sets in total, with Prechtel winning 2 and Machac winning 0. The last match between Prechtel and Machac was at the M15 Kramsach, 18-07-2019, Second, Clay with Sebastian Prechtel getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sebastian Prechtel | 1 |
| Tomas Machac | 0 |
M15 Kramsach(18-07-2019)
6
3
6
4
| Prechtel | Stats | Machac |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (7-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (15-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 894 | Ranking | 20 |
| 545 | Highest Rank | 20 |
| 28 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 11 |
| 56% (302-241) | Career Total W/L | 66% (273-139) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $3,180,290 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiafoe VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Sebastian Prechtel
Player
Tomas Machac
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:12:0 | Average Match Time | 1:12:0 |
| 56% (27/48) | 1st Serve % | 72% (48/67) |
| 93% (25/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (27/48) |
| 62% (13/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 46% (31/67) | Return Points Win % | 21% (10/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sebastian Prechtel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Sebastian Prechtel
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sebastian Prechtel
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoya Honda
Player
Sebastian Prechtel
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
51
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Prechtel
Player
Leo Deflandre
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
58
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Player
Sebastian Prechtel
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Prechtel
Player
Giorgio Tabacco
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(3) 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Tomas Machac Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tomas Machac
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tomas Machac
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Sebastian Baez
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Reilly Opelka
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
8
Aces
19
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Tomas Machac
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
45
Total Points Won
41
|
4-6 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
95%
(
37 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
12 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (302/241) | Win/Loss | 66% (273/139) |
| 54% (675/564) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (619/344) |
| 52% (5925/5577) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (4992/4078) |
| 52% (61/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (83/37) |
| 58% (219/156) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (78/45) |
| 44% (22/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (106/51) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 990 | Aces Total | 1767 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1273 | Total Double Faults | 795 |
| 1:5:9 | Average Match Time | 1:36:2 |
| 439.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 209.91 |
| 59% (14449/24575) | 1st Serve % | 62% (17115/27655) |
| 65% (9394/14449) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (12126/17086) |
| 46% (4697/10126) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (5708/10566) |
| 44% (1198/2694) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1250/2891) |
| 42% (10268/24492) | Return Points Win % | 40% (11492/28577) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 66% (31/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 55% (17/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 73% (8/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 65% (45/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (6/12) | Challenger W/L | 67% (116/56) |
| 56% (296/228) | Futures W/L | 69% (54/24) |
| 55% (296/536) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 70% (256/367) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 52% (58/112) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (88/149) |
| 52% (81/156) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (63/117) |
| 87% (303/263) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (275/241) |
| 13% (303/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (275/28) |
| 16% (240/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (136/31) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
